Contents |
The Brillouin function[1][2] is a special function defined by the following equation:
The function is usually applied (see below) in the context where x is a real variable and J is a positive integer or half-integer. In this case, the function varies from -1 to 1, approaching +1 as and -1 as .
The function is best known for arising in the calculation of the magnetization of an ideal paramagnet. In particular, it describes the dependency of the magnetization on the applied magnetic field and the total angular momentum quantum number J of the microscopic magnetic moments of the material. The magnetization is given by:[1]
where
Click "show" to see a derivation of this law: |
---|
A derivation of this law describing the magnetization of an ideal paramagnet is as follows.[1] Let z be the direction of the magnetic field. The z-component of the angular momentum of each magnetic moment (a.k.a. the azimuthal quantum number) can take on one of the 2J+1 possible values -J,-J+1,...,+J. Each of these has a different energy, due to the external field B: The energy associated with quantum number m is
(where g is the g-factor, μB is the Bohr magneton, and x is as defined in the text above). The relative probability of each of these is given by the Boltzmann factor: where Z (the partition function) is a normalization constant such that the probabilities sum to unity. Calculating Z, the result is:
All told, the expectation value of the azimuthal quantum number m is
The denominator is a geometric series and the numerator is a type of arithmetic-geometric series, so the series can be explicitly summed. After some algebra, the result turns out to be With N magnetic moments per unit volume, the magnetization density is
|
In the classical limit, the moments can be continuously aligned in the field and can assume all values (). The Brillouin function is then simplified into the Langevin function, named after Paul Langevin:
For small values of x, the Langevin function can be approximated by a truncation of its Taylor series:
An alternative better behaved approximation can be derived from the Lambert's continued fraction expansion of tanh(x):
For small enough x, both approximations are numerically better than a direct evaluation of the actual analytical expression, since the later suffers from Loss of significance.
The inverse Langevin function can be approximated to within 5% accuracy by the formula[3]
valid on the whole interval (-1, 1). For small values of x, better approximations are the Padé approximant
and the Taylor series[4]
When i.e. when is small, the expression of the magnetization can be approximated by the Curie's law:
where is a constant. One can note that is the effective number of Bohr magnetons.
When , the Brillouin function goes to 1. The magnetization saturates with the magnetic moments completely aligned with the applied field: